Obama’s Stealth Influence in Biden’s Administration

A recent revelation from The New York Times has stirred controversy by inadvertently confirming suspicions held by many conservatives: former President Barack Obama is not merely a shadowy figure in the current administration, but actively shaping its direction. This revelation, brought to attention by Steve Bannon and analyzed by The Gateway Pundit, sheds light on the significant influence Obama wields over President Joe Biden’s administration, prompting concerns about the true authority guiding American governance.

Steve Bannon, a well-known conservative voice, points to an article by Katie Rogers in The New York Times as evidence of Obama’s deep involvement in undermining former President Donald Trump. Bannon suggests that this piece not only showcases Obama’s hostility towards Trump but also uncovers his direct interactions with White House staff, effectively giving directives and molding policies from behind the scenes. This narrative, previously championed by conservative sources like The Gateway Pundit, now gains unexpected credibility from a mainstream media outlet.

Treasonous Barack Obama and the Soros Family are responsible for the LAWFARE being waged against President Trump.

This is the ‘Deep State’. pic.twitter.com/cb0kHiWLFV

— Liz Churchill (@liz_churchill10) March 25, 2024

The implications of Obama’s active role in the Biden administration are vast. It suggests a seamless continuation from his presidency to the present one, with Obama’s political agenda persisting in shaping the country’s trajectory. This covert orchestration by a former president marks uncharted territory in contemporary American history, sparking concerns about the transparency and autonomy of the Biden-led administration.

Critics argue that this arrangement could erode democratic processes, with decisions not being made by the elected president but by a predecessor lacking current official status or accountability. The disclosure that Obama has been directly contacting White House staffers, as reported by The New York Times, paints a picture of an administration guided not by the current elected leader but by someone from the past.

HOLY SHIT…

“Who is to benefit? This crime can only be a link, in a chain of attempts, by those who are at war with our country since 2014”.

Putin is referring the Obama State Dept/CIA who overthrew Ukraine (Nuland).

Putin is blaming the Deep State…pic.twitter.com/0gdTUashCX

— Clandestine (@WarClandestine) March 25, 2024

Moreover, Obama’s alleged actions to counter Trump’s influence and ensure continuity of his policies through Biden’s administration suggest strategic maneuvering that transcends mere guidance or mentorship. It hints at a deliberate effort to retain control over the Democratic Party’s trajectory and the broader political landscape, potentially sidelining Biden in the process.

This development also illuminates internal dynamics within the Democratic Party. Obama’s apparent lack of faith in Biden, as indicated by his direct involvement, reveals deeper rifts and concerns regarding the party’s future and leadership capabilities. It prompts questions about the extent to which Biden can assert his own vision and authority within his administration and party.

As conservatives digest this information, it reinforces long-standing suspicions about power dynamics in Washington, D.C. The report from The New York Times inadvertently provides ammunition to those arguing that the current administration is essentially an extension of Obama’s tenure, with the former president still exerting influence. This disclosure not only challenges the narrative of Biden’s independence but also calls into question the essence of leadership and decision-making at the highest levels of American politics.

In summary, The New York Times’ validation of Obama’s active role in the Biden administration marks a pivotal moment in our understanding of the current political landscape. It validates conservative apprehensions about the persistence of Obama’s influence and sets the stage for a broader discourse on governance, transparency, and the true locus of power within the Biden White House. As this revelation unfolds, it is bound to provoke further debate and scrutiny from all political perspectives.