in

Injunction Issued Against Jen Psaki for Alleged Suppression of Conservatives on Social Media

Press Secretary Jen Psaki holds a press briefing on Wednesday, Aug. 4, 2021, in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House. (Official White House Photo by Cameron Smith). Original public domain image from Flickr

A federal judge mentioned former White House press secretary and MSNBC host Jen Psaki in an injunction. This injunction is currently preventing the Biden administration from meeting with tech companies about digital censorship.

United States Judge Terry A. Doughty of the Western District of Louisiana approved the injunction after lawsuits from Republican Attorneys General Erik Schmitt of Missouri and Jeff Landry of Louisiana concerning free speech.

The allegations say the White House pushed tech companies to silence free speech during the coronavirus epidemic and during the 2020 presidential election.

Psaki Pushed for Tech Companies to Censor Their Online Platforms

In the injunction, Doughty noted at a White House press conference, Psaki issued a public reminder to Facebook and other social media platforms about the potential “legal consequences” they could face.

Psaki said these legal issues could emerge if they failed to intensify their efforts in censoring misinformation.

On July 15, 2021, Psaki joined Surgeon General Vivek Murthy in launching an advisory on coronavirus misinformation. She was telling the press that the Biden Administration had regular contact with tech giants to flag such content online.

The injunction quoted Psaki as saying companies such as Twitter, Facebook, and Google must suppress misinformation, disinformation, or content deemed unsuitable. This, according to her, tends to derive from conservative sources.

If Allegations Prove to be True, the Biden Administration Attacked the First Amendment Without a Care

Doughty said if the allegations are true, it would be one of the most significant assaults on free speech in American history. That’s if the federal government ignored First Amendment protections.

Doughty recently rejected the Biden administration’s request to dismiss the case filed by Louisiana and Missouri attorneys general.

In his ruling, Doughty stated the plaintiffs put forth credible claims of First Amendment violations by the federal government to crush speech that they deemed to be untrustworthy.

This article appeared in The Record Daily and has been published here with permission.

What do you think?

Written by Western Reader

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

Bold Robbery in California Jewelry Store

Zelensky Sounds Alarm on Russian Plot to Attack Ukrainian Nuclear Power Plants